[MD] X = no-self

[rapsncows at fastmail.fm]

Marsha,



> >> 
> >> Marsha:  
> >> I am a collection of ever-changing, interdependent, inorganic,
> >> biological, social and intellectual static patterns of value entangled
> >> within a field of DQ.  
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> > [Tim]
> > Marsha, I like the update to 'entangled within a...", but I think that
> > 'field' might bring in associations that you don't intend (EM field...).
> 
> Marsha:
> John is responsible for the 'entanglement' update.

[Tim]
by 'John', then, you mean that pattern within yourself which you call
'John' for pragmatic reasons, so as not to lead to too much confusion,
right?

> [Marsha]  I don't know EM field.

[Tim]
EM stands for electro-magnetic.
    

> 
> 
> > [Tim] Question 1: are you / can you be, aware of anything that is not included
> > in this 'collection'?
> 
> Marsha:
> Aware?  My answer is no.  There may very well be all sorts of
> unrecognized 
> patterns included in the collection but outside awareness means outside 
> awareness.  That would be an excellent reason, though  to cultivate a
> more 
> subtle awareness.

[Tim]
yes, outside awareness means outside awareness.  But on the primary
front, just to be sure, do you hold any belief, hope, or expectation of
a pattern external to the above mentioned 'collection'?
   
thanks Marsha,
all the best,
Tim
-- 
  
  rapsncows at fastmail.fm

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Does exactly what it says on the tin