[MD] X = no-self

[MarshaV]

On Jan 5, 2011, at 4:54 AM, rapsncows at fastmail.fm wrote:

> Marsha,
> 
> 
> 
>>>> 
>>>> Marsha:  
>>>> I am a collection of ever-changing, interdependent, inorganic,
>>>> biological, social and intellectual static patterns of value entangled
>>>> within a field of DQ.  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> [Tim]
>>> Marsha, I like the update to 'entangled within a...", but I think that
>>> 'field' might bring in associations that you don't intend (EM field...).
>> 
>> Marsha:
>> John is responsible for the 'entanglement' update.
> 
> [Tim]
> by 'John', then, you mean that pattern within yourself which you call
> 'John' for pragmatic reasons, so as not to lead to too much confusion,
> right?

Marsha:
Right.   John, too, is a collection of patterns.  I've probably bumped into 
only a very few.



>> [Marsha]  I don't know EM field.
> 
> [Tim]
> EM stands for electro-magnetic.
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> [Tim] Question 1: are you / can you be, aware of anything that is not included
>>> in this 'collection'?
>> 
>> Marsha:
>> Aware?  My answer is no.  There may very well be all sorts of
>> unrecognized 
>> patterns included in the collection but outside awareness means outside 
>> awareness.  That would be an excellent reason, though  to cultivate a
>> more 
>> subtle awareness.
> 
> [Tim]
> yes, outside awareness means outside awareness.  But on the primary
> front, just to be sure, do you hold any belief, hope, or expectation of
> a pattern external to the above mentioned 'collection'?

Marsha:
Just to be sure, I don't hold any-thing.  These patterns seem to process through 
consciousness: ever-changing and interconnected.  By expectation of an external 
pattern do you mean a reified fantasy.  Not lately.  If I've misunderstood, you will 
need to re-explain your point and question.  


> thanks Marsha,
> all the best,
> Tim
> -- 


Marsha


 
___