[MD] chariotness

[Carl Thames]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jan-Anders" <jananderses at telia.com>
To: <moq_discuss at lists.moqtalk.org>
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 7:20 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] chariotness


> Hi Carl
>
> I think it is well described in Lila the first part. Science, physics and 
> chemistry, is positively exact about reality (SOM) but doesn't take notice 
> about moral, decency and other values. The metaphysics of Quality is about 
> whats behind both physics and social values. Whats behind the evolution of 
> a professor in chemistry when 2nd law of enthropy wants to tear all the 
> atoms and molecules apart. By understanding the 4 levels for example (ch 
> 12. Lila) you can see the difference and how they interact and counteract 
> each other.
>
> Jan-Anders

I read that, and came away with the feeling that it was both subjective and 
cultural.  One of the biggies that I got from ZAMM was that beauty and truth 
were both events, not absolutes.  Because of that, they would both be 
subjective also.  The whole thing seems a bit of an exercise in mental 
gymnastics, which is fine with me, because I like doing those.   This would 
seem to be arguing on the side of intellectual vs. actual, though.  I'm not 
sure I'm comfortable doing that either.