[MD] chariotness
Jan-Anders
jananderses at telia.com
Mon Jan 10 05:20:17 PST 2011
Hi Carl
I think it is well described in Lila the first part. Science, physics
and chemistry, is positively exact about reality (SOM) but doesn't take
notice about moral, decency and other values. The metaphysics of Quality
is about whats behind both physics and social values. Whats behind the
evolution of a professor in chemistry when 2nd law of enthropy wants to
tear all the atoms and molecules apart. By understanding the 4 levels
for example (ch 12. Lila) you can see the difference and how they
interact and counteract each other.
Jan-Anders
moq_discuss-request at lists.moqtalk.org skrev 2011-01-10 13.56:
> Thanks for answering. At what point does the "meta" apply? That's the
> heart of the question, I think. Doesn't "metaphysics" of quality then
> become nonsensical? It either has a quality or it doesn't. Maybe I'm
> drawing too fine a line here, but I don't see the distinction.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list