[MD] The Quality of Free Will

[MarshaV]

On Jul 17, 2011, at 11:10 AM, david buchanan wrote:

> 
> Marsha keeps saying:
> ... Of freewill, determinism and causation, I neither accept them nor reject them. They are static patterns of value, sometimes useful illusions and sometimes not. As static patterns of value, they are not Ultimately Real.  ... I can only repeat:  I neither accept free-will, determinism & causation, nor reject free-will, determinism & causation; they are static patterns of value that have at times been considered useful illusions, but are not Ultimately Real.
> 
> 
> dmb says:
> Riddle me this, viking woman: What is the difference between a genuine paradox and your equivocating weasel words? One has a subtle and profound meaning while the other is merely evasive and has no meaning at all. Can you guess which is which?
> 




Marsha:
You sure don't now...   Ad hominem attacks, and you say she says he says are the best you can do.  

 
___