[MD] The Quality of Free Will

Andre Broersen andrebroersen at gmail.com
Tue Jul 19 00:37:41 PDT 2011


Andre to Dave:
Just another insert Dave. When I talked about "Leave it in the weather 
for a number of years and yeah, the changes are noticeable because 
dynamic influences occur at subatomic levels all the time. But for 
pragmatic reasons the notion of using 'ever changing' when you mean 
'stable' or 'static' is confusing because misleading"... I should also 
have added the 'forces' of regeneration, the stabilizing quality to 
latch the advances made. It are these repeated patterns that make them 
stable, recognizable.

To add to the confusion Marsha has gotten herself into is that she now 
denies DQ as being change. She says: "I consider DQ to be indeterminate 
- unknowable, undefinable, and undividable - unpatterned".

Now, on its own this is a bit more like it. BUT she still considers 
DQ=sq and sq=DQ. She has said so repeatedly. She considers herself to be 
an ever changing pattern of...within a stable whatever. You work it out 
Dave because I can't anymore.

I agree with dmb: "sigh".






More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list