[MD] The Quality of Free Will
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Tue Jul 19 12:56:29 PDT 2011
Joe,
It just some investigation,; not meant as anything definitive.
My point was your "locus of awareness" cannot be an object of
knowledge.
Thanks.
Marsha
On Jul 19, 2011, at 3:43 PM, Joseph Maurer wrote:
> Hi Marsha,
>
> I don't like the adjective "subjective" modifying consciousness as the locus
> of my awareness. There is no proper distinction between thought
> (mathematics) and emotions (dynamic) in the adjective "subjective". It is
> very confusing as it overwrites the evolutionary supposition for an
> indefinable/definable basket of goodies. This leaves logic floundering.
> Logic in the rest of the paragraph is diluted by "subjective".
>
> Joe
>
>
> On 7/19/11 11:48 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> I have been puzzling over the experience of subjective
>> consciousness - awareness. It is experience but I cannot
>> observe it, like an eye cannot see itself. It seems not to
>> be permanent and seems to control nothing. It witnesses.
>> On investigation this is NOT an autonomous self. But
>> it is experience and yet not an object of knowledge.
>>
>> Marsha
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 19, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Joseph Maurer wrote:
>>
>>> Hi MarshaV and all,
>>>
>>> Practice makes perfect! DQ is knowable, but it is not definable. That
>>> reminds me of emotions. E.G., Define Love!
>>>
>>> The habits that I purposefully develop, enable me to more or less find the
>>> role that I must assume in each instance to maintain the dynamic reality in
>>> existence. I think such preparation is called work. Once I lose my way, I
>>> find myself repeating mechanically, for a whole lifetime, a set of
>>> activities which keep me alive. I explain them to my neighbor who then
>>> agrees that I am a good fellow, and I stay out of dynamic trouble because it
>>> is too hard to keep attention at such a trigger point for the decision
>>> making necessary for evolution to heroic levels of behavior which heroes
>>> have achieved down through history, e.g., Pirsig.
>>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/18/11 6:20 PM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I do not consider DQ to be change. I see it as indeterminate, as unknowable,
>>>> undefinable, and undividable, or as unpatterned.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
___
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list