[MD] The other side of Value

[118]

Hi Ham,

On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Ham Priday <hampday1 at verizon.net> wrote:
> Hi Ron --
>
[Ron]
>> What you call nothingness as a limit, fails to explain
>> movement, it does not account for the "why" of
>> experience, it does not account for the good.
>
[Ham]
> The appearance of movement in space, like change over time, is the mode of
> human experience.  Spacio-temporal perception of differentiated "otherness"
> is a dimensional aspect of experiential value and reflects the primary
> self/other dichotomy I mentioned previously.  All human experience is
> derived from the differentiation and objectification of Value, our
> sensibility of which is limited by the nothingness of our individuated
> awareness.

[Mark]
Ham, would you say the our "attraction" to the absolute source can be
considered to be spacio-temporal perception?  That is, it involves
movement?

Thanks,
Mark
>

>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>