[MD] The reification issue completely misunderstood

Joseph Maurer jhmau at comcast.net
Sun Jun 5 20:09:58 PDT 2011




On 6/5/11 3:49 PM, "118" <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Joe,
> Quite the contrary, it is words that are soporific.  Words entrap one into the
> static.
> 
> Mark
> 
Hi Mark,

Words are a manifestation.  You have to be already trapped to manifest in a
soporific mode.

Joe

> On Jun 5, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 6/5/11 7:26 AM, "118" <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Marsha,
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 9:56 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Jun 3, 2011, at 3:33 PM, 118 wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Marsha,
>>>>> Yes, and Buddha claimed to be a common man, first.
>>>>> 
>>>>> My question to you is: Taking out who you list below, who is left?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Mark
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Hi Mark,
>>>> 
>>>> An answer:  There is some experience of being awake.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Marsha
>>>> 
>>> [Mark]
>>> Yes, Buddha was certainly "awake".  He help many others wake up during
>>> his lifetime.  I think that much of this is relegating static quality
>>> to the social level of words.
>>> Mark
>> 
>> Hi Mark,
>> 
>> I guess deaf mutes are forbidden the social level, and cannot be awake!
>> 
>> Joe
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 3, 2011, at 10:18 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jun 3, 2011, at 12:46 PM, david buchanan wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> And yet Marsha says she hates reification and loves Bo.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Marsha:
>>>>>> I neither hate reification, nor love Bo, as you state it.   I already
>>>>>> stated:  Reification represents how the common man and many scientists,
>>>>>> academics and even philosophers think.  It evolved as tool to facilitate
>>>>>> some kind of betterness.  But it is flawed and of course the MoQ can help
>>>>>> rectify the flaw.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Well, actually, I love all, even you, can you believe it...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ___
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ___
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>> 
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html





More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list