[MD] cloud of probability

[118]

Dear Joe,
What in the heck are you going on about?
Mark

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:
> Hi Ham and all,
>
> A blind, deaf mute can't see or hear.  Does he have any way of defining his
> experience?  Maybe a definition of "metaphysics" is beyond words, outside of
> definitions, just experience.  The metaphysics of experience?
>
> Joe
>
>
> On 6/10/11 12:00 PM, "Ham Priday" <hampday1 at verizon.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>  On Jun 10, 2011, at 1:02 PM, david buchanan wrote:
>>
>>> Like the man says, and like every reasonable person knows,
>>> metaphysics must be definable, divisible and knowable or
>>> there isn't any metaphysics.
>>>
>>> "Since a metaphysics is essentially a kind of dialectical definition
>>> and since Quality is essentially outside definition, this means that
>>> a 'Metaphysics of Quality' is essentially a contradiction in terms,
>>> a logical absurdity."  (LILA, Chapter 5)
>>
>> Why, then, did the man choose to call his Quality thesis a "metaphysics"?
>> Did he want his acolytes to spend their time trying to resolve a
>> contradiction?
>>
>> Just curious,
>> Ham
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>