[MD] cloud of probability

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi David and all,

The horse I am wrestling with is evolution!  You seem to imply that there is
an evolutionary difference between concepts and reality.  From the way I
look at things that is misguided.  Concepts identify reality so they must be
a part of reality?  Pirsig accepted evolution.  It seems that the
discrepancy you see between concepts and reality is outside evolution and is
a mere active and passive consideration.  Is reality conceptual? DQ/SQ!  Is
evolution conceptual? DQ/SQ!


On 6/13/11 10:28 AM, "david buchanan" <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com> wrote:

> But there must always be a discrepancy between concepts reality because the
> former are static and the latter is dynamic. The latter is undifferentiated
> and the former is all chopped up into bits. Those static bits ARE words and
> concepts. To counter the demand for proper use of terms with quotes about
> undefined Dynamic Quality is to change the subject from dictionaries to the
> mystic reality, from reason to mysticism. To confuse these two things is to
> misunderstand the distinction between DQ and static quality.