[MD] cloud of probability

[Andre Broersen]

Jan-Anders to Dan:

We all know that Marshas next contribution is not predictable and therefore dynamic but does she also got a sense of humour?

Andre:
Disagree Jan-Anders. Her next contribution is very predictable. The only thing that cannot be predicted is what static pattern she is going to use: ignoring the post, evading the issue,wriggling her way out by claiming to be misrepresented, misunderstood or otherwise wrongfully addressed.

Anyone of these predictable scenarios involve a static choice. Now, to follow Dan: if Marsha comes up with a novel response, a response she has not displayed before, a response which shatters her own predictable patterns... then she is acting Dynamically. Since I have been on this discuss I have not seen this. (not that this means much!but go through the archives as well).

You regard this as a display of dynamic behaviour?

And, ps, no, I do not think Marsha has a sense of humour. She takes herself too seriously...too ever changing, conventionally herself. She only laughs in spite.