[MD] cloud of probability

[Jan-Anders Andersson]

No I'm not whining, its my job to help our customers to make it through these unstable, ever changing and unpredictable market conditions. I am employed by a New Jersey based company with global services.

If all patterns where static there should be no need to specify them as static. Dynamic patterns are these patterns that are NOT static. Not this, not that.. Evolution is  a dynamic pattern for ex.

Have a noisy dye

J-A

14 jun 2011 kl. 21.07 skrev moq_discuss-request at lists.moqtalk.org:

> Hello everyon
> 
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Jan-Anders Andersson
> <jananderses at telia.com> wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>> 
>> I think you contradict yourself when you first say that there are no dynamic patterns and then later whine at the U S real estate market.
> 
> Dan:
> 
> I wasn't aware that I was whining. Thank you for bringing that to my
> attention. But I see no contradiction.
> 
>> J-A:
>> A pattern is something known, it can be static and predictable but there are patterns that are known but not predictable, like the Market which is the firm, steady and reliable base for the worlds economy and so on. Patterns that are definitely NOT static got to be defined as dynamic.
> 
> Dan:
> 
> The real estate market has Dynamic tendencies, sure. But these are not
> patterns. Read dmb's posts to Marsha. Or re-read them. You are missing
> something important.
> 
> J-A:
> If you can tell how something will be in the next second, then it is
> predictable and in a static process. Every businessman shout for a
> free and open, unpredictable market but all he does is in practice is
> trying to avoid the unpredictable and to close out his competitors. If
> the Market were static and predictable, there would not exist
> something like risk revenue or true competition. To get a static and
> predictable market we would need a planned economy with a fixed rate
> of interest which is nothing else than just boring like hell.
> 
> Dan:
> 
> Now who is whining?