[MD] The notion of Free Will

[MarshaV]

This last post should have addressed Jan-Anders, not Marsha - Marsha - Marsha...   



On Jun 28, 2011, at 2:30 AM, MarshaV wrote:

> 
> On Jun 28, 2011, at 1:40 AM, Jan-Anders Andersson wrote:
> 
>> Hi Marsha
>> 
>> 27 jun 2011 kl. 18.44 sMarsha wrote:
>> 
>>> Not to be repeating myself, I neither accept the notion of freewill, nor reject it.  Same goes with determinism and causation.  I accept that these are conventional (static) notions, but not Ultimately real.  While living within a conventional culture it seems wise to sustain social and biological patterns whenever necessary for one will be held responsible to that level's "moral" code (laws and punishment. ) 
>> 
>> Even if you neither accept nor reject it. I really would like to understand what you mean with "The notion of Free Will". Please.
>> 
>> Jan-Anders
> 
> 
> Jan-Anders,
> 
> It means whatever it conventional means.  What is the meaning of the pattern named Justice?  How would you describe its meaning?  How would you describe the meaning of any pattern.   I understand static patterns to represent a collection of interdependent, ever-changing particular momentary events (process) which constantly change as they arise, abide and pass away: and as they are continually altered by an individual’s static history and the dynamics of the event.  I have mentioned before that I tend also to think of patterns, pattern(x) for instance, to include all-that-is opposite-from-non-pattern(x).  That may include a dictionary definition.  -  The horns of a rabbit might be a static notion or pattern.  
> 
> How well do you think you understand my explanation?  
> 
> 
> Marsha  
> 
> 
> ___



 
___