[MD] The Dynamics of Value

[MarshaV]

Greetings Gentlemen!

To try to take this discussion back to the basics I might state that your argument points to a difference in the nature of reality.  Ham's reality is logically deduced, while the reality within the MoQ is solely based on experience (Quality/Value).  For Ham, logic is the highest form of knowledge, and represents an inexorable truth.  For Mark, logic is but one type of experience among many in an ever-changing flow of experiences.  Experiences including a portion recognized as a previous established pattern, and a portion that is unrecognizable and new.  I do not see how these two very different points-of-view, Ham's absolute and Mark's dynamic, can be reconciled.  

Have I got it all wrong?  If so, I apologize, and ask you to re-establish the major points of the debate.

Thank you.



Marsha



___