[MD] [Bulk] Re: desires

[Horse]

Hi Marsha

On 28/03/2011 10:55, MarshaV wrote:
> Stating that "sq is not other than DQ" does not leave sq out; it includes both

It may include both terms but all this statement does is negate "sq is 
other than DQ" - i.e."it is not the case that SQ is other than DQ" and 
that is what is being disputed! Merely re-stating your previous 
statement that "DQ is sq and sq is DQ" using different words is no 
improvement
Static patterns are definable - DQ is not definable. Your statement says 
the opposite. Rather that both are definable or both are not.
If something is definable then how is it equivalent to the non-definable 
- or vice-versa?

Horse


-- 

"Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid."
— Frank Zappa