[MD] [Bulk] Re: desires

[MarshaV]

Horse,

Try this:

I haven't seen any argument that refutes that the fundamental nature of sq is DQ.   

Do you want to answer the question:  Might you agree that ice is not other than water?  


Marsha




On Mar 28, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Horse wrote:

> Hi Marsha
> 
> On 28/03/2011 10:55, MarshaV wrote:
>> Stating that "sq is not other than DQ" does not leave sq out; it includes both
> 
> It may include both terms but all this statement does is negate "sq is other than DQ" - i.e."it is not the case that SQ is other than DQ" and that is what is being disputed! Merely re-stating your previous statement that "DQ is sq and sq is DQ" using different words is no improvement
> Static patterns are definable - DQ is not definable. Your statement says the opposite. Rather that both are definable or both are not.
> If something is definable then how is it equivalent to the non-definable - or vice-versa?
> 
> Horse
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> "Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid."
> — Frank Zappa
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___