[MD] keep on truckin

[MarshaV]

Hi Mark,

I could continue:  Static quality is Dynamic Quality.  Dynamic Quality is static quality.  Static quality is not other than Dynamic Quality.  Dynamic Quality is not other than static quality.  

Is that too much to add?  That is how I've seen it.  That is my experience/interpretation.  Too Buddhist?   


Marsha



On May 12, 2011, at 10:01 PM, 118 wrote:

> Hmmm Marsha,
> That's an awful lot of definitions.
> Mark
> 
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:59 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On May 12, 2011, at 10:14 AM, ARLO J BENSINGER JR wrote:
>> 
>>> [Marsha]
>>> Ever-changing but within a stable, predictable pattern.
>>> 
>>> [Arlo]
>>> Ever-changing (DQ) and giving rise to stable, predictable patterns (SQ).
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha:
>> For me, Dynamic Quality is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable.
>> Static patterns of value are processes: impermanent, interdependent,
>> ever-changing.  No subjects.  No objects.  Not things-in-themselves.
>> Overlapping, interconnected, ever-changing processes that pragmatically
>> tend to persist and change in a stable, predictable pattern.
>> 
>> 
>> ___



 
___