[MD] keep on truckin

[MarshaV]

It's straight from the heart...   


On May 13, 2011, at 2:20 AM, MarshaV wrote:

> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> I could continue:  Static quality is Dynamic Quality.  Dynamic Quality is static quality.  Static quality is not other than Dynamic Quality.  Dynamic Quality is not other than static quality.  
> 
> Is that too much to add?  That is how I've seen it.  That is my experience/interpretation.  Too Buddhist?   
> 
> 
> Marsha
> 
> 
> 
> On May 12, 2011, at 10:01 PM, 118 wrote:
> 
>> Hmmm Marsha,
>> That's an awful lot of definitions.
>> Mark
>> 
>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:59 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On May 12, 2011, at 10:14 AM, ARLO J BENSINGER JR wrote:
>>> 
>>>> [Marsha]
>>>> Ever-changing but within a stable, predictable pattern.
>>>> 
>>>> [Arlo]
>>>> Ever-changing (DQ) and giving rise to stable, predictable patterns (SQ).
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha:
>>> For me, Dynamic Quality is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable.
>>> Static patterns of value are processes: impermanent, interdependent,
>>> ever-changing.  No subjects.  No objects.  Not things-in-themselves.
>>> Overlapping, interconnected, ever-changing processes that pragmatically
>>> tend to persist and change in a stable, predictable pattern.
>>> 


 
___