[MD] Keep on duckin'

John Carl ridgecoyote at gmail.com
Fri May 20 13:48:49 PDT 2011


Hi Marsha,

Well, I finally made it to Williston, ND.  Nothing is as I thought it would
be.  The prairie intrigues me, however.  In California if you drive for more
than a couple of hours, the topography completely changes, here you can go
for days and it's all the same.  It's weirdly exhiliarating.

I dispute one part of your following definition:

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 6:35 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

>
> dmb,
>
> Here's my definition of Dynamic Quality and static quality.
>
> For me, Dynamic Quality is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable.
>


John:

Unknowable?  What does that mean?  It seems to me to contradict the basic
tenant of the MoQ which is that while Quality is indefinable - you KNOW
"WHAT IT IS.  As the most empirical of all reality, how can we not know DQ?


That's my question.

by all means, take your time in thinking out a response to my query.  Who
knows when I'll have a chance to wifi again.  And my laptop is making
squeaky noises on startup and refusing to respond to the on button unless I
turn it upside down.  I think it got bumped off the bed in the RV one two
many times on shakey North Dakotan roads.

Take care,

John truckin' on. (sans truck)



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list