[MD] Keep on duckin'

[MarshaV]

Hello John, 


On May 20, 2011, at 4:48 PM, John Carl wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> 
> Well, I finally made it to Williston, ND.  Nothing is as I thought it would
> be.  The prairie intrigues me, however.  In California if you drive for more
> than a couple of hours, the topography completely changes, here you can go
> for days and it's all the same.  It's weirdly exhiliarating.
> 
> I dispute one part of your following definition:
> 
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 6:35 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> dmb,
>> 
>> Here's my definition of Dynamic Quality and static quality.
>> 
>> For me, Dynamic Quality is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable.
>> 
> 
> 
> John:
> 
> Unknowable?  What does that mean?  It seems to me to contradict the basic
> tenant of the MoQ which is that while Quality is indefinable - you KNOW
> "WHAT IT IS.  As the most empirical of all reality, how can we not know DQ?
> 
> 
> That's my question.


Dynamic Quality?  At which point, there is no-thing to know, and no one to 
know it.  -  It is static quality that you know, which includes the tenant of the MoQ.  



> by all means, take your time in thinking out a response to my query.  Who
> knows when I'll have a chance to wifi again.  And my laptop is making
> squeaky noises on startup and refusing to respond to the on button unless I
> turn it upside down.  I think it got bumped off the bed in the RV one two
> many times on shakey North Dakotan roads.

Hey!  Take better care of that laptop!   

Plans are to go into NYC tomorrow.  Hmmm.   To visit Ground Zero, not the 
MOMA.  Your, adventure, though, sounds more interesting than mine.  


> Take care,
> 
> John truckin' on. (sans truck)


Be well,  


Marsha 


 
___