[MD] complementarity

[118]

Marsha,
Then why did you say mutually exclusive?  Did you mean something else?
Mark

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:37 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 1:34 PM, 118 wrote:
>
>> Yes, mutually exclusive.  They exist independently.
>> Mark
>
>
> Mark,
>
> They do not exist independently for me.
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:51 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> The unpatterned/patterned may be compared with quantum physics's complementarity.  Both are experientially and equally real and important, but mutually exclusive.
>>>
>>>        the complementarity between the aptitude of time and the sentient life of trees
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>