[MD] complementarity

[MarshaV]

Hi Mark,

Your last post to dmb, concerning me, made clear to me you are much more interested in painting me in cartoon colors, than what I might have to say.  You wrote to dmb:  "I think she sees herself as the roadrunner, but she is more like the coyote (and I don't mean John).  Perhaps a sheep in "woof's" clothing.  Or is it Elmer Fudd?  You cwazy Wabbit!"

Should I be concerned that you understand the basis of my understanding.  No. Find out for yourself.   


Marsha
 
 



On Nov 10, 2011, at 5:34 PM, 118 wrote:

> Marsha,
> Then why did you say mutually exclusive?  Did you mean something else?
> Mark
> 
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:37 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Nov 10, 2011, at 1:34 PM, 118 wrote:
>> 
>>> Yes, mutually exclusive.  They exist independently.
>>> Mark
>> 
>> 
>> Mark,
>> 
>> They do not exist independently for me.
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:51 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> The unpatterned/patterned may be compared with quantum physics's complementarity.  Both are experientially and equally real and important, but mutually exclusive.
>>>> 
>>>>        the complementarity between the aptitude of time and the sentient life of trees
>>>> 
>>>> 


 
___