[MD] complementarity

[118]

My dear Marsha,
Don't get all caught up in the static social quality.  Look beyond it.  It is liberating.  One avatar posting to another.  This is not a school yard.

Cheers
Mark

On Nov 10, 2011, at 8:50 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> Your last post to dmb, concerning me, made clear to me you are much more interested in painting me in cartoon colors, than what I might have to say.  You wrote to dmb:  "I think she sees herself as the roadrunner, but she is more like the coyote (and I don't mean John).  Perhaps a sheep in "woof's" clothing.  Or is it Elmer Fudd?  You cwazy Wabbit!"
> 
> Should I be concerned that you understand the basis of my understanding.  No. Find out for yourself.   
> 
> 
> Marsha
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 5:34 PM, 118 wrote:
> 
>> Marsha,
>> Then why did you say mutually exclusive?  Did you mean something else?
>> Mark
>> 
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:37 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Nov 10, 2011, at 1:34 PM, 118 wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Yes, mutually exclusive.  They exist independently.
>>>> Mark
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Mark,
>>> 
>>> They do not exist independently for me.
>>> 
>>> Marsha
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:51 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> The unpatterned/patterned may be compared with quantum physics's complementarity.  Both are experientially and equally real and important, but mutually exclusive.
>>>>> 
>>>>>       the complementarity between the aptitude of time and the sentient life of trees
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html