[MD] seeing

[MarshaV]

On Nov 11, 2011, at 8:32 AM, X Acto wrote:

>  
> To all,
>  
> Hagan:
> 
>   "Consciousness is nothing more than the splitting of Reality into this and that.  "
> 
> Marsha:
> Not this, not that...  
> 
> Ron:
> This concludes then that "UN-consciouness" is what all life is striving towards if
> "Not this, not that" accurately describes the nature of DQ in the most general terms.
> 
> Which seems to conflict with the idea that intellectual quality is the most moral form
> of Quality.

Marsha:
Intellectual patterns would be the highest form of static quality, but 

	While sustaining biological and social patterns
	Kill all intellectual patterns.
	Kill them completely
	And then follow Dynamic Quality
	And morality will be served.

It seems to me that to follow DQ would be of even higher value. 


> Ron:
> Also it seems to conflict with the idea that DQ is "everchanging" for change is making
> the conscious splitting from past to present into "this and that".

Marsha:
Dynamic Quality is indeterminate.  It promotes change in static quality, but is, 
in conventional terms, itself indivisible, undefinable and unknowable.  If you are 
going to assign some absolute meaning to "not this, not that" you've missed the point. 


> Ron:
> Therefore I have my doubts as to the effective use of the term "not this, not that" as the best
> general understanding of DQ.

Marsha:
If the expression doesn't work for you, don't use it.  But I'd like to know if you are suggesting 
there is suppose to be a one-size-fits-all general understanding?  How would that be 
determined?  Are you going to chase everybody who disagrees with you off this list and 
then come to an agreement?  

 
___