[MD] Labels and Ostracisms

[ridgecoyote at gmail.com]

I don't know about that Arlo, it being such a good thing.  How does one judge conversation?  Is a good dialogue one In which no disagreement occurs?  In my experience, good conversation is that which has a certain flow in a "good orderly direction".  Something that goes somewhere.  But the fact that you bring up the subject, long after the protagonists of theism have given up and fled, is a clue to something that must be going on in your own head.  

Admit it.  You miss Platt. :-)

John

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 26, 2011, at 2:14 PM, "ARLO J BENSINGER JR" <ajb102 at psu.edu> wrote:

> [John]
> The thrust of my point, concerned your concern over advocates for a view that
> the MoQ is a theism.  My question for you, is who the heck are you talking
> about?
> 
> [Arlo]
> This is all in the archives, John, and I wasn't thinking about any one person
> or persons specifically, just that this argument has been brought to the table
> here several times; that it hasn't in a while is a good thing.
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html