[MD] Labels and Ostracisms
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Mon Nov 28 07:59:22 PST 2011
[John]
But the fact that you bring up the subject, long after the protagonists
of theism have given up and fled, is a clue to something that must be
going on in your own head.
[Arlo]
Apparently they have not 'fled', John.
[John]
... is a clue to something that must be going on in your own head.
[Arlo]
Only that it represents a redefinition, both of Pirsig's MOQ and the
meaning of 'theism', to the point where both are distorted beyond value.
I also pointed out its the same inanity that says "atheism is a form of
theism", in the case of the MOQ you are saying that "anti-theism is a
form of theism", which may help those in need of theism sleep at night,
but does nothing for the MOQ (or theism).
[John]
Anti-theism is probably the single biggest factor In the promulgation of
SOM.
[Arlo]
Since the MOQ is anti-theistic, and it opposes SOM, this statement is
about as gross a misunderstanding of the MOQ as I've seen. But this just
proves my point.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list