[MD] The Relativist's journey

[118]

Hi Joe,
In my opinion, physics is no more real than metaphysics.  They are both descriptions created by the human mind.  Of course metaphysics is much older, and therefore has much more information associated with it.  However, the principles of physics are a very simplified view, and are therefore easier to grasp without much study.  We have been taught to find more reality in the description of physics, but this too shall pass.

I am not sure if you are speaking of a balance between the spiritual and the material.  If you are, I agree.

Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
Mark

On Nov 30, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:

> Hi Mark,
> 
> Physics, what we define as what we know!  Metaphysics an indefinable order
> in existence, evolution!  Pirsig saw the need for a reality of experience of
> an indefinable metaphysical DQ as necessary for an scientific SQ order for
> logic.  He proposed a Metaphysics of Quality DQ/SQ.
> 
> How?  Does evolution embrace Physics (definable SQ), or Metaphysics
> (indefinable DQ)?  IMHO this distinction between a physical and metaphysical
> order SQ/DQ highlights boundaries for the playing field in logic for tilting
> at the windmills of reality.  I suggest that the knowledge DQ/SQ evolution
> describes an order for existence in logic through which metaphysics as DQ/SQ
> manifests.
> 
> Joe  
> 
> 
> On 11/30/11 9:27 AM, "118" <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> All I am saying is that our logic is a function of evolution.  That
>> is, logic arises from evolution.
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html