[MD] "Could have acted differently" v. "the extent to which we perceive DQ"

[Horse]

So where are we disagreeing?
Quality is Reality.
Quality is DQ and SQ.
Reality is DQ and SQ.
SQ alone is not Reality.
DQ alone is not Reality.
So where are we disagreeing?

Horse


On 11/09/2011 13:11, MarshaV wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2011, at 7:17 AM, Horse wrote:
>
>> Static patterns of value are ideas about reality and not the experience of reality - SQ is our attempt to order reality and order it in a way that makes sense - or agrees with the senses. But "I's", "O's", "S's" and "I's" no more "exist" than "S's" or "O's" - i.e. they are all deduced from Quality and are not primary. IPOV's are a better way of carving up Quality than S/O, but it is Quality that is Reality.
>
>
> Hi Horse,
>
> Oh dear...   Hmmm...  I won't get into the I-level conflict, because:  Reality is Quality(unpatterned experience/patterned experience) is as pure as it gets.  imho.
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
-- 

"Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid."
— Frank Zappa