[MD] "Could have acted differently" v. "the extent to which we perceive DQ"

X Acto xacto at rocketmail.com
Sun Sep 11 06:41:05 PDT 2011



> [Arlo]
> I don't know, you are saying (if I understand) there is DQ and there are
> illusions. Nothing else. So you'd support calling SQ, perhaps, "inorganic
> illusions, biological illusions, social illusions and intellectual illusions"?

Ron:
It's a caveat to keep in mind that inorganic, biological, social and intellectual values
are all intellectual, they are ideas, catagories and distinctions about experience.
 
It is a fair assumption to assert that all experience is merely a limited part of a greater
limitless indefinable  or "Dynamic Quality"
 
I think it should give us pause to consider how we use the term "Real" in our conversations
because what is "real" is the good by way of consequence and not the chaotic distinctionless
limitless and indefinable. It is should also gives us pause to consider how we use the term
"Dynamic Quality".
 
..


More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list