[MD] Moral Responsibility

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi Ham and all,

Metaphysics cannot be contained in mathematical descriptions, physics.  It
is a different discipline.

SOM logic is tied to a theory of knowledge which uses an intentional/real
division in existence for a differentiation between knowledge and reality.
It is hard to plant a tree in my brain!  Joe and Maurer exist differently!

DQ/SQ metaphysics tasks SOM! DQ/SQ denies reality to an intentional
existence needed for abstraction, SOM.  DQ is indefinable not unknowable.
It is real, indefinably existing in the knowledge of a sentient being.  In
MOQ indefinable DQ has reality in knowledge along with defined SQ.  Will
makes moral choices.  This indefinable reality in all knowledge becomes the
touchstone of morality.  My toe made me do it!

I choose my behavior and I am rightfully coerced for my crimes.  For myself
I place DQ in emotions, rather than sanity.  Others will conceive it
differently. 

The base of truth in logic changes to a truth in individuality in the moral
environment.  0 is a symbol of no logical existence in MOQ.  But what about
metaphor and analogy?  Different strokes for different folks.  How does 10
or Roman numeral X differ?  They are both symbols from differing cultural
origins.      

SOM's definition of an intentional existence necessary for abstraction hides
reality under a cover.  Mathematical certainty for morality beyond
reasonable doubt! My toe made me do it!  The judge will decide!  I am crazy,
my metaphysics are all mixed up!

Joe  


On 9/14/11 5:13 PM, "Ham Priday" <hampday1 at verizon.net> wrote:

> The only "mathematical logic" I am aware of that can be applied to
> 
metaphysics concerns the prime unity (Infinity) vs. differentiated existence
> 
(Finitude).  This may be expressed as 1/α = 0 or α/N = α, neither of which
> 
is conceptually meaningful.