[MD] A problem with the MOQ.

[Tuukka Virtaperko]

Andre,
>
> The only thing I find, on this discuss with regards to 'improvements 
> on Pirsig's MOQ' are organic and primal social (i.e biological and 
> narcissistic) wanks.

Why don't you stop wanking *me* and complaining you wouldn't like to do 
so? :D

In my previous message, I told the SOQ can be used to make Langan and 
others understand a mistake in the CTMU, which is a surprisingly popular 
metaphysical theory Langan uses to advocate fascism and eugenics. How is 
that not a result?

The canonic MOQ doesn't appeal to analytic philosophers. But no more 
underlining of this point. As you do not seem to know, what analytic 
philosophy is, this point is irrelevant for you. I don't plan to help 
you with that. Sorry.

Tuukka