[MD] A problem with the MOQ.

[X Acto]

Marsha had stated:
 My interpretation/experience of the “self” within the MoQ is a flow of ever-changing, conditionally co-dependent, impermanent and conceptualized static patterns (dharma) of inorganic, biological, social and intellectual value in the infinite field of Dynamic Quality.    
> 
> 
> What could be clearer?


Ron replies:
> Because no one has your experience except you, no one really knows or
> understands your interpretation of your said experience. Therefore that
> statement can only be clear to you, your experience and your interpretation
> of that experience. But you continue to state it in such a way that you believe
> everyone ought to immediately understand what you mean. which according
> to you, they could'nt possibly do.

Marsha retorts:
Just sharing some experience and an interpretation.  You do not need to except it.  We can just toss out the empiricism, and most importantly radical empiricism and instead use ridicule.  Never mind the 'Don't take my word for it.  Find out for yourself.'
 
Ron:
That comment was never made in your post. The above is not ridicule, it's a critique. You asked
"what could be clearer?" I replied that it's not clear at all and by using your own assertions it could
never truly be clear to anyone else besides you. Right? everyone else is always projecting apon
any statement made, so nothing you say or mean is ever "clear" or could ever be.

Marsha:  

Are you complaining that I will not play like a Philosophologist?  

Ron:
No, just complaining  that if you truly believed what you are
saying you would'nt constantly be saying it.
 
..