[MD] truth, again

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Thu Dec 6 22:24:02 PST 2012


Hi Joe,

When you write of emotion do you mean like/dislike or something else?


Marsha



On Dec 6, 2012, at 5:32 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:

> Hi MarshaV and All,
> 
> IMHO Evolution describes a hiearchy in existence validating  DQ indefinable
> emotional existence, SQ definable mathematical logic.  How is SQ intellect a
> higher level than DQ emotions.  Intellect is definable logic available to
> all, emotions embody indefinable logic available only to the individual.
> 
> Experience is indefinable individualized DQ.  When Experience in an order is
> manifest in an individual everyone acknowledges the more encompassing
> reality of ideas when compared to emotions and the static intellectual level
> is a higher reality than indefinable emotional perception.
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/5/12 10:08 PM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Greetings,
>> 
>>   "It is the beginning, the genesis, that stands ready to be replaced.  The
>> singular and all-important moment of creation at the beginning of the Big Bang
>> --- the beginning of time and existence --- is poised to be swept aside.  In
>> other words, it's the bang in the Big Bang that we, in our endless quest to
>> understand the world, are ready to abandon.  That single moment of creation
>> with no before has been done in by the very precision of the science that gave
>> the idea a measure of reality."
>>     (Frank, Adam, 'About Time: Cosmology and Culture at the Twilight of the
>> Big Bang', p. xiv)
>> 
>> Marsha:
>> I am in agreement with those who think the best approach to discovering the
>> Ultimate Truth (DQ) is by discovering what is false:  not this, not that.
>> 
>> And another one bites the dust.
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list