[MD] truth, again
valkyr at att.net
Thu Dec 6 22:24:02 PST 2012
When you write of emotion do you mean like/dislike or something else?
On Dec 6, 2012, at 5:32 PM, Joseph Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:
> Hi MarshaV and All,
> IMHO Evolution describes a hiearchy in existence validating DQ indefinable
> emotional existence, SQ definable mathematical logic. How is SQ intellect a
> higher level than DQ emotions. Intellect is definable logic available to
> all, emotions embody indefinable logic available only to the individual.
> Experience is indefinable individualized DQ. When Experience in an order is
> manifest in an individual everyone acknowledges the more encompassing
> reality of ideas when compared to emotions and the static intellectual level
> is a higher reality than indefinable emotional perception.
> On 12/5/12 10:08 PM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> "It is the beginning, the genesis, that stands ready to be replaced. The
>> singular and all-important moment of creation at the beginning of the Big Bang
>> --- the beginning of time and existence --- is poised to be swept aside. In
>> other words, it's the bang in the Big Bang that we, in our endless quest to
>> understand the world, are ready to abandon. That single moment of creation
>> with no before has been done in by the very precision of the science that gave
>> the idea a measure of reality."
>> (Frank, Adam, 'About Time: Cosmology and Culture at the Twilight of the
>> Big Bang', p. xiv)
>> I am in agreement with those who think the best approach to discovering the
>> Ultimate Truth (DQ) is by discovering what is false: not this, not that.
>> And another one bites the dust.
More information about the Moq_Discuss