[MD] Metaphysics and the mystic.

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi David,

Making a thing of DQ so I can respond to it changes the metaphysics of DQ/SQ
where SQ represents the 'thing' by definition.

Joe 


On 2/1/12 8:32 PM, "David Harding" <davidjharding at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Mark and Joe, 
> 
> I think consciousness is ability to respond to DQ. What's wrong with this
> definition?
> 
> -David.
> 
> 
> Joe wrote:
>> Hi Mark and All,
>> 
>> If you look at the etymology of the word "consciousness" you see two roots
>> "Con" "scious" "With" "awareness" or "knowledge". Two principles are
>> involved, evolution and science. To make sense of that you have to posit an
>> evolutionary description of reality "conscious" and "mechanical" or
>> "mathematical" differences. And the hunt is on!
>> 
>> Indefinable DQ definable SQ as a metaphysical base enables the recognition
>> of the meaning of "consciousness". Alright so you propose "evolution" as
>> deciding the levels in existence, consciousness. Mathematical order is
>> inadequate since something is created from 0. The definition of 1 has been
>> changed in speech or consciousness. I do not know how to make sense out of
>> "consciousness" except through evolution which as yet does not have a
>> metaphysical foundation! E(x) out of, voluntas, will. Creation!
>> 
>> It seems to me it would be a lot easier if the levels in evolution after 1
>> were definable in DQ/SQ terms since evolve "ex" "voluntas" out of will,
>> suggests a mathematical order and creation. Metaphysics involves 'Will' and
>> 'order' in a dance beyond definable mathematics! 1 is rigid without
>> evolution which redefines 1 in consciousness.
>> 
>> Joe 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> Mark wrote: 
>> 
>>> Maybe
>>> you can contribute to what you think consciousness is
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html