[MD] Metaphysics and the mystic.

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi David,

This is the way I conceive DQ!

IMHO There can be no conception of DQ alone.  Evolution is DQ/SQ.  When I
place DQ in a sentence I am embodying reality in a concept SQ which is
definable, and is only DQ by analogy.  Evolution already has occurred.  DQ
is only analogous.  There are no words for DQ.

Placing DQ in the beginning mind of consciousness in metaphysics is analogy
since it is indefinable.  DQ is analogous to faith in an individual.  What
is logic?  Logic follows evolution.  DQ is perceptible and I am responsible
for my actions.  Evolution sniffs the trail of DQ.

There are a whole lot of analogies in metaphysics, but woe to the person of
physics who feels he can conceive indefinable DQ.

Hopefully the consciousness that responds to DQ has done a lot of homework
otherwise physics and metaphysics are in the same boat.

Joe 


On 2/2/12 1:27 PM, "David Harding" <davidjharding at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Joe,
> 
> 
>>> I think consciousness is ability to respond to DQ. What's wrong with this
>>> definition?
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
>> Making a thing of DQ so I can respond to it changes the metaphysics of DQ/SQ
>> where SQ represents the 'thing' by definition.
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> That static quality 'responds' to DQ doesn't change the fact that DQ is
> undefined. For if new ideas don't come from DQ where do they come from?
> 
> Consciousness is some thing which is able to change patterns and make them
> better.  Of course once we recognise anything is better it is static quality
> and no longer the source of all things.
> 
> -David.
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html