[MD] NYC
118
ununoctiums at gmail.com
Tue Jan 3 21:57:05 PST 2012
Hi Marsha,
It appears we are talking past each other. Second hand is the same as one step removed, that is why it is called second hand. I have no interest in saying the same thing. Let's move on OK.
Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
Mark
On Jan 3, 2012, at 9:23 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
>
> Mark,
>
> I never mentioned being "one step removed from reality" in any case; you are projecting again. There is experience(unpatterned/patterned). I wrote:
>
> As you well understand, I was stating that the direct perceptions from moseying down Broadway, rather than the second-hand conceptualizations gleaned from reading a book, are a more direct experience of New York City.
>
> And:
>
> "This direct perception of pure Dynamic Quality without any intellectual mediation is the same as the goal of Buddhism known as ‘awakening’ or ‘enlightenment’. (Pirsig, 1994)"
> (The MoQ Textbook)
>
> Please note: "without any intellectual mediation". And I have no questions for you.
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
> On Jan 3, 2012, at 6:51 PM, 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Marsha,
>>
>> It is all experience, nothing second-hand about it. We create
>> experience; experience is not sensed. It cannot be second-hand if we
>> are responsible for its generation. What would it be second-hand to?
>> Just because you involve more senses, does not make your NY any more
>> direct of an experience. It is still a creation of our minds. Both
>> examples of NY are second-hand constructions, if you want to use that
>> terminology (even though it is somewhat nonsensical). I do not see
>> how you can be one step removed from reality in one case, and not in
>> the other.
>>
>> Remember, we do not hear sounds, we create sounds with our ears and
>> brains. We do not see color, we create color internally. We do not
>> have experiences, we create them. We can create an experience of NY by
>> reading about it. By the way, if you want to read a great book about
>> NY, try Winter's Tale by Mark Helprin. It will leave you with the
>> smell, the sound, the sights, the touch, and the taste, all from one
>> little fictional book. You will have been more in NY than if you were
>> there in person. I recommend it!
>>
>> I do not know how else to explain it any better. Ask me a specific
>> question and I will try to use your concepts to have you understand
>> what I am trying to say.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mark
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 6:15 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Mark,
>>>
>>> 'Reading about' is second-hand constructed experience of NYC, rather than the seeing, hearing, smelling, touching & tasting aspects of NYC directly. But maybe you would like to explain "direct experience" as you are using the term.
>>>
>>>
>>> Marsha
>>>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list