[MD] relative

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Tue Jan 10 10:36:32 PST 2012


Tuukka,

This post was sent premature and accidentally.  Its sentiments were incomplete and should not be projected into anything more.  I do apologize.


Marsha 



Sent from my iPad

On Jan 10, 2012, at 1:07 PM, mail at tuukkavirtaperko.net wrote:

> Marsha,
>>> 
>>> These may sound like cryptic buzzwords to the layman. But to a  person who has devoted much effort to these kind of things they are  preferable.
>> 
>> Are you talking about yourself?
> 
> I'm talking about someone who does for job something that the general public will readily perceive as generic philosophy. That would not be me, and the MOQ would currently not be generic philosophy. These kind of people peer-review journals. Sure, we have devoted a lot of effort to this too, but that wasn't what I meant when I said that. By "these kind of things" I did not mean only philosophy, but the academic traditions one has to adhere to in order to be a generic philosopher. The generic philosopher probably has a PhD and he's interested of stuff like "rehabilitation of the coherence theory of truth and in the reconstruction of philosophical pragmatism in line with the idealistic tradition" (from a Wikipedia entry about Rescher).
> 
> -Tuukka
> 
 
 


More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list