[MD] relative
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Wed Jan 11 03:41:00 PST 2012
Tuukka,
There is nothing in the dictionary's philosophic definition of 'relativism' or the dictionary's definition of 'relative' that I posted that indicates either term to be valueless or prohibits assigning value.
Marsha
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 11, 2012, at 6:21 AM, mail at tuukkavirtaperko.net wrote:
> Mark, Marsha,
>
> I think Marsha is doing the opposite of what Mark suggests. She is imposing a Buddhist definition of relativism on the West. She is somewhat hostile towards the Western tradition, labeling it is post-modern "mumbo jumbo" or what ever that was. If she ain't doing that anymore (I'm not sure) that's what she was doing earlier.
>
> In any case, that's not a good thing to do either, because it does not defuse the argument.
>
> -Tuukka
>
>
>
> Quoting MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>:
>
>>
>>
>> Mark,
>>
>> This is just plain baloney.
>>
>>
>> Marsha
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 10, 2012, at 7:07 PM, 118 wrote:
>>
>>> Marsha,
>>> You are imposing Western Values on Buddhism by resorting to the Western notion of Relative.
>>>
>>> Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
>>> Mark
>>>
>>
>>
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list