[MD] relative

[118]

Marsha,
In terms of MoQ there is not just valuelessness but destructiveness, you just refuse to acknowledge it.  See my previous posts for explanation.

Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
Mark

On Jan 11, 2012, at 3:41 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

> 
> Tuukka,
> 
> 
> There is nothing in the dictionary's philosophic definition of 'relativism' or the dictionary's definition of 'relative' that I posted that indicates either term to be valueless or prohibits assigning value.
> 
> Marsha
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Jan 11, 2012, at 6:21 AM, mail at tuukkavirtaperko.net wrote:
> 
>> Mark, Marsha,
>> 
>> I think Marsha is doing the opposite of what Mark suggests. She is imposing a Buddhist definition of relativism on the West. She is somewhat hostile towards the Western tradition, labeling it is post-modern "mumbo jumbo" or what ever that was. If she ain't doing that anymore (I'm not sure) that's what she was doing earlier.
>> 
>> In any case, that's not a good thing to do either, because it does not defuse the argument.
>> 
>> -Tuukka
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Quoting MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Mark,
>>> 
>>> This is just plain baloney.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jan 10, 2012, at 7:07 PM, 118 wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Marsha,
>>>> You are imposing Western Values on Buddhism by resorting to the  Western notion of Relative.
>>>> 
>>>> Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
>>>> Mark
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html