[MD] The first cut.
Joseph Maurer
jhmau at comcast.net
Thu Jan 19 14:00:56 PST 2012
Hi DMB,
There is a logic in quoting words of RMP: "Life can't exist on Dynamic
Quality alone. It has no staying power.".... "Although Dynamic Quality,
the quality of freedom, creates the world in which we live, these patterns
of static quality, the quality of order, preserve our world. Neither static
nor Dynamic Quality can survive without the other."
The question that I have: Are DQ and SQ describing discrete levels in
existence, evolutionary levels?
Joe
On 1/19/12 7:47 AM, "david buchanan" <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com> wrote:
> If you can't grasp difference between stability and constant change, then you
> have no business discussing anything that requires precision of meaning.
>
>
> That was the reason and here is the evidence...
>
>
>
> RMP:
> "With the identification of static and Dynamic Quality as the fundamental
> division of the world, Phaedrus felt that some kind of goal had been reached.
> ..Life can't exist on Dynamic Quality alone. It has no staying power. To cling
> to Dynamic Quality alone apart from any static patterns is to cling to chaos."
> "...static patterns, nevertheless, provide a necessary stabilizing force to
> protect Dynamic progress from degeneration. Although Dynamic Quality, the
> Quality of freedom, creates this world in which we live, these patterns of
> static quality, the quality of order, preserve our world. Neither static nor
> Dynamic Quality can survive without the other."
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list