[MD] Is Quality a monism?

[MarshaV]

On Jul 16, 2012, at 9:24 AM, Ant McWatt <antmcwatt at hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

> Then again, I get the impression that the MOQ asserts (or at least the MOQ of LILA; the simple "everyday affairs" version for the Western philosophologist) that ALL static entities (can) respond to DQ; from atoms through to plants, from brown bears to human beings.  As such, maybe Andre's "DQ/sq" substitution makes Protagoras's original statement too wide.  And, as you know with Marsha's use of the word "ghost", once the referring subjects for a term become too wide, then, in effect (i.e. in practice), the word becomes useless.


Hi Ant,

Except that man's experience of ALL static entities from atoms to plants to brown bears to other human beings is filtered through the restrictions/measurement of your his own consciousness (mind and senses.)
 
 
Marsha