[MD] Is Quality a monism?

[Ant McWatt]

On Jul 16, 2012, Ant McWatt <antmcwatt at hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
 
> Then again, I get the impression that the MOQ asserts (or at least the MOQ of LILA; the simple "everyday affairs" version for the Western philosophologist) that ALL static entities (can) respond to DQ; from atoms through to plants, from brown bears to human beings.  As such, maybe Andre's "DQ/sq" substitution makes Protagoras's original statement too wide.  And, as you know with Marsha's use of the word "ghost", once the referring subjects for a term become too wide, then, in effect (i.e. in practice), the word becomes useless.
 
 
Marsha V stated July 16th:
 
Except that man's experience of ALL static entities from atoms to plants to brown bears to other human beings is filtered through the restrictions/measurement of... his own consciousness (mind and senses.)
 
 
Ant McWatt comments:

That's right Marsha.  It is indeed a high quality idea that "man's experience of ALL static entities from atoms to plants to brown 
bears to other human beings is filtered through the 
restrictions/measurement of his own consciousness."

Best wishes,

Ant.


.