[MD] The value of static patterns.

[David Harding]

Hi Mark,

>> Yeah, however what's best in the Western perspective?
> 
> In my opinion, what is wrong with the Western perspective is written
> about by Pirsig in ZAMM after Phaedrus goes to the "other side", and
> is wandering the city.  An alternative to that could be "best" for the
> Western perspective.  Thus MoQ.

So there's nothing good in the current Western perspective? 

>> So sq is there just to point to DQ?
> 
> That is one of the things that it does.  It also helps us start our
> cars in the morning, and choose food from a menu.  Yes... that's about
> it, just those three things unless you can think of some others...

Not really...

>> 
>> So we just need to have a goal of DQ and not sq? So if I just have a goal of
>> DQ, then I need not worry about the patterns I am creating?
> 
> Not a goal of DQ, a goal of understanding.  Why do you wish to learn
> more about MoQ by participating in this forum?  This is a serious
> question, I just want to understand.

Yes, to understand and in the process make myself a better person.

-David.