[MD] The value of static patterns.

[118]

David,
What is this 20 questions?  I have no problem answering, but do you have any opinions of your own.

On Mar 21, 2012, at 4:46 PM, David Harding <davidjharding at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Mark,
> 
>>> Yeah, however what's best in the Western perspective?
>> 
>> In my opinion, what is wrong with the Western perspective is written
>> about by Pirsig in ZAMM after Phaedrus goes to the "other side", and
>> is wandering the city.  An alternative to that could be "best" for the
>> Western perspective.  Thus MoQ.
> 
> So there's nothing good in the current Western perspective? 

There is plenty good we are speaking of betterness within MoQ.
> 
>>> So sq is there just to point to DQ?
>> 
>> That is one of the things that it does.  It also helps us start our
>> cars in the morning, and choose food from a menu.  Yes... that's about
>> it, just those three things unless you can think of some others...
> 
> Not really...

Then that is the sum total.
> 
>>> 
>>> So we just need to have a goal of DQ and not sq? So if I just have a goal of
>>> DQ, then I need not worry about the patterns I am creating?
>> 
>> Not a goal of DQ, a goal of understanding.  Why do you wish to learn
>> more about MoQ by participating in this forum?  This is a serious
>> question, I just want to understand.
> 
> Yes, to understand and in the process make myself a better person.

My goal too.  How's it working out for you?  Any insights you wish to share?

Mark
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html