[MD] Drivel v MOQ

[Jan-Anders Andersson]

Awright

But if there were no unreason there would be no need for reason.

Jan Anders


25 mar 2012 kl. 01.32 skrev moq_discuss-request at lists.moqtalk.org:

> Either Marsha or Mark said:
> Yes, my posts are meant for those who wish for a way out of the static world of thought. The idea is to free oneself from words.
> 
> dmb says:
> This is another good example. First you have the delusional grandiosity wherein the poster claims to transcend the normal limits of thoughts and words and then you have the logical incoherence of the claim. Reading or writing to free yourself from words is like driving your car around to free yourself from fuel consumption. It is a humorously conspicuous performative contradiction. In other words, it's so stupid that it's funny.