[MD] lila's soliloquy

[118]

AArrgghh MRB,
What are you doing?!  Now I have to read all about Gorham!  I thought
I had read everything I needed to piece everything together, but now
THIS!  I should have stayed in bed today, all complacent with
everything that I knew.

BTW, paganism explains everything much better in terms of my
experience here.  Why go after some all pervading presence when there
are configurations that work much better.

Oh, I forgot, we are supposed to be civilized.  No more Majik for us
enlightened soles.  We need to stop gaping and find a reason for it
all.  Get to work, I have things to explain.  Now where was I....?
Four levels which interact with each other, which makes 24 pristine
interactions, then we throw in the confabulation variable, and we get
7 colors of each, divided by 6 flavors....No! that would be 5 flavors
because of the static principle...Now I am getting somewhere!

Thanks!

Mark

On 3/30/12, Michael R. Brown <mrb at fuguewriter.com> wrote:
> Hi Joseph -
>
>> The rigid logic of mathematics cannot embrace indefinable DQ.  Levels in
> evolution embrace DQ.  The rigid logic of mathematics cannot embrace 1 as a
> metaphysical principle of 1, individuality, which flows through different
> disciplines in evolution.
>
> Forgive me if I've posted it before, but the whole idea of disciplines of
> being is worked out very interestingly in the Pagan (and possibly
> anti-Semitic) amateur philosopher, Melvin E. Gorham - my page on him:
> http://www.marymaclane.com/gorham/
>
>
> MRB
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>