[MD] FYI: Human Behavioral Biology

[118]

Hi Marsha,
Sure, the experience you are creating can be explained any way you feel appropriate, so far as I am concerned.  It is simply a description that you use to impart meaning to others.  That is the purpose of any description.  It is a synopsis of belief.

Cheers,


Mark

On Nov 1, 2012, at 11:52 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

> 
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> Or I could think that what I am experiencing is ever-changing, conditionally co-dependent and  impermanent static (patterned) inorganic, biological, social and intellectual value in the infinite field of Dynamic Quality.  The _change_ taking place is as interesting as the theories.   :-)   Seems like a giant net of complexity.  
> 
> Fascinating world,,, though I do feel concern for the animals being USED for testing.  
> 
> 
> Marsha
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Nov 1, 2012, at 3:09 PM, 118 wrote:
> 
>> Hi Marsha,
>> 
>> Welcome to my world!  Yes it is interesting.
>> 
>> To keep it all in perspective, all these scientific endeavors are temporary constructs that are put together.  Science is changing rapidly these days, and it is easy to be "out of date".  Everything we think is true today, will be seen as extremely ignorant in the future.
>> 
>> However the process itself never changes.  That of painting elaborate pictures to represent our experience.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> 
>> Mark
>> 
>> On Oct 30, 2012, at 1:06 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Just finished Lecture #5, Molecular Genetics II.  OMG!  SOOOOOoooooo interesting...   I know not everyone has the required time or interest, but if you do, don't miss.  
>>> 
>>> Yea Barbara McClintock!!!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Oct 29, 2012, at 12:24 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Greetings,  
>>>> 
>>>> This seems to be a great course on Human Behavioral Biology.   I happen to watch Episode 23. on language and found it fascinating.  It is a Stanford University course and the professor, Robert Sapolsky, is lively and interesting.  In the Introduction the professor talks about categorical thinking which might easily be seen as patterned thinking.  If you have the time, you might consider taking a look, or not.     
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNnIGh9g6fA  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Marsha
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html