[MD] two good questions...

[MarshaV]

Mark,

Certainly not with an unlatched, unwarranted, intuitional conceit acting as authority will you get me to unnecessarily affirm any conjecture with your rhetorical dribble.  Reality is what isn't.  The fundamental nature of static quality is Dynamic Quality, or stated differently, the fundamental nature of the conditional is the indeterminate.  I do not accept a disjunctive world.  So I agree with Niels Bohr that "every sentence I utter must be understood not as an affirmation, but as a question.", or as hypothetical.


Marsha 


On Oct 20, 2012, at 2:56 PM, 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> I am not sure how to answer your question.  Could you phrase it in a
> different way?  I am not quite sure what you are asking.  What is it that
> you are trying to find out?  You had said that everything you post is a
> question.  I am confused.
> 
> Of course the reality we put into words is part of reality.  Is that what
> you are asking?  I suppose I am confused by your use of the term reality.
> Reality is what is.  A presentation of reality is reality as it happens.
> 
> Like I said, I have a problem understanding what you are seeking with your
> questions.
> 
> Cheers,
> Mark
> 
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:07 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Mark,
>> 
>> “The reality we can put into words is never reality itself.”
>>   (Werner Heisenberg)
>> 
>> I agree with Werner Heisenberg that the reality we can put into words is
>> never reality itself, and I did state to Jan-Anders, long ago, that the
>> problem I see both question #1 & #2 addressing concerns the nature of
>> reality.  As I said, the questions were already answered.
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 19, 2012, at 6:10 PM, 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I guess it is said that there is no such thing as a stupid question?
>> Sometimes I wonder?
>>> 
>>> Mark?
>>> 
>>> On Oct 18, 2012, at 12:19 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Mark,
>>>> 
>>>> So simple...
>>>> 
>>>> "Every sentence I utter must be understood not as an affirmation, but
>> as a question."
>>>> (Niels Bohr)
>>>> 
>>>> Marsha:
>>>> I agree with Niels Bohr that every sentence I utter must be understood
>> not as an affirmation, but as a question, or as hypothetical.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html