[MD] two good questions...
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Mon Oct 22 00:42:21 PDT 2012
Mark,
At the moment, the continuous present is valuable.
Marsha
On Oct 21, 2012, at 2:23 PM, 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
> Marsha,
> Could you rephrase the question? I have no idea what you are asking.
> Understanding lasts all our life. It is that SQ which we create. Is this
> what you are asking?
>
> What is what? Please describe your question.
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 1:21 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Mark,
>>
>> You say a value (understanding) lasts how long? So what is it?
>>
>>
>> Marsha
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 20, 2012, at 2:56 PM, 118 wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Marsha,
>>> I am not sure how to answer your question. Could you phrase it in a
>>> different way? I am not quite sure what you are asking. What is it that
>>> you are trying to find out? You had said that everything you post is a
>>> question. I am confused.
>>>
>>> Of course the reality we put into words is part of reality. Is that what
>>> you are asking? I suppose I am confused by your use of the term reality.
>>> Reality is what is. A presentation of reality is reality as it happens.
>>>
>>> Like I said, I have a problem understanding what you are seeking with
>> your
>>> questions.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Mark
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:07 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mark,
>>>>
>>>> “The reality we can put into words is never reality itself.”
>>>> (Werner Heisenberg)
>>>>
>>>> I agree with Werner Heisenberg that the reality we can put into words is
>>>> never reality itself, and I did state to Jan-Anders, long ago, that the
>>>> problem I see both question #1 & #2 addressing concerns the nature of
>>>> reality. As I said, the questions were already answered.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Marsha
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 19, 2012, at 6:10 PM, 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I guess it is said that there is no such thing as a stupid question?
>>>> Sometimes I wonder?
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 18, 2012, at 12:19 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mark,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So simple...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Every sentence I utter must be understood not as an affirmation,
>>>>>> but as a question."
>>>>>> (Niels Bohr)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Marsha:
>>>>>> I agree with Niels Bohr that every sentence I utter must be understood
>>>>>> not as an affirmation, but as a question, or as hypothetical.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Marsha
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list